Pilot audit

Audit the governance of an AI-assisted software project.

Establish what was decided, what is proven, what conflicts, and what still requires human authority.

DUBSAR Audit is a professional review, not an automatic scanner. Authorized project sources are examined under a defined mandate, findings remain tied to evidence, and a human validates every conclusion.

Remote · Read-only by default · Human-operated · Bounded scope

When it helps

When speed has outgrown project coherence.

  1. 01 · Continuity

    The project cannot be resumed with confidence

    Objectives, active constraints, and decisions are scattered across sessions and tools.

  2. 02 · Evidence

    Agent claims are difficult to verify

    A report says tests passed or work is complete, but the supporting artifact is missing or contradictory.

  3. 03 · Authority

    Human approval is assumed rather than recorded

    Sensitive transitions happen without an attributable decision and a clear authorization boundary.

  4. 04 · Contradictions

    GitHub, tickets, documents, and conversations disagree

    Conflicting sources remain unresolved, making the real project state hard to establish.

Process

A controlled review, from mandate to closeout.

The website only qualifies the request. No audit starts here, and submitting the form grants no access to any system.

  1. Qualification request
  2. Mandate & scope
  3. Read-only collection
  4. Cross-analysis
  5. Human validation
  6. Report & closeout

Audit scope

Ten bounded controls. No general promise of compliance.

Control matrix

PilotHuman-reviewed

  1. 01Mission continuity
  2. 02Session identity
  3. 03Decision traceability
  4. 04Claim-to-evidence linkage
  5. 05Human authority
  6. 06Source provenance
  7. 07Contradiction handling
  8. 08Resumption continuity
  9. 09Scope and least privilege
  10. 10Report limitations

Possible sources

AuthorizedRead-only

  • GitHub
  • Jira
  • Confluence
  • Linear
  • Notion
  • Slack
  • Google Drive
  • Controlled local exports

Availability depends on the client's tools, permissions, workspace policy, and the agreed audit scope.

Deliverable

A report that separates facts, inferences, contradictions, and decisions.

The client receives a bounded report designed for both executive and technical reading.

  • executive summary and audit mandate;
  • sources reviewed and known access gaps;
  • control-by-control findings and severity;
  • evidence references and provenance;
  • registered contradictions and accepted uncertainty;
  • prioritized recommendations and report limitations.

Report boundary

Evidence-backed

Authority
Human validation
Mutations
None by default
Format
PDF + evidence register

DUBSAR does not certify regulatory compliance, guarantee defect-free code, or let an agent approve its own conclusions.

Operating boundaries

What the pilot audit will not do.

  • No credentials, tokens, or source archives are collected through this website.
  • No connector is authorized by submitting the request form.
  • No project change, ticket, comment, or remediation is created by default.
  • No source is treated as complete or authoritative without qualification.
  • No result is delivered without human review.

Pilot request

Describe the problem before sharing any system access.

Audit intake Qualification only Human review No automatic access

Do not submit credentials, tokens, source code, confidential documents, or repository links containing access secrets. This form only determines whether a bounded DUBSAR audit could fit your project.
Your role
Engineering team size
Which coding agents are used on the project?
Which sources could be included in a read-only audit?

Requests are reviewed manually. Submission does not guarantee acceptance or access.

Purpose: audit qualification and response only. No analytics, no marketing tracking, no sale of data. Submissions are processed by Form.taxi.

Agents can move fast.
A serious project still needs an attributable account of what happened.